Detailed math and considerations for when—and when not—to use Happy Jumps at different stages of your Torn progression.
Guide written by CPrinceC | Original Torn forum post
Thread created on 01:52:40 – 20/04/19 (6 years ago) | Last replied 19:54:02 – 29/06/25 (1 hour ago)
I wrote this not to tell people not to Happy Jump but to explain what the real value of a Happy Jump is at different points of your game and what you sacrifice doing it early on repeatably.
I very much enjoy helping new players to the game, but when some of them read and see the effects of a Happy Jump they don't understand that the math is more complicated than it may seem and there are other things to think about besides rushing your training!
I always have an issue with guides that only explain how to do a Happy Jump without explaining why and when not to do one, so I got off my ass, did the math, and made some examples of what is going on when you Happy Jump, FHC train, or natural train (with Xanax for all and no job points—although in the end energy jobs are way better than Happy Jobs unless you have the Happy Book).
For a while I stopped trying to fight the guides and explaining to new players that Happy Jumps aren't all as good as people make them out to be long term. Yes, I do see value in one or two of them in your very first few days if you can rack up the funds, but after that I argue the bad facts about Happy Jumps:
All scenarios assume:
| Method | Stat Gain |
|---|---|
| Method A | 7 353 |
| Method B | 19 951 |
| Method C | 5 656 |
Conclusion: Method B yields the fastest early burst. Method A underperforms, and Method C saves ~25 m but is only ¼ as effective.
| Method | Stat Gain |
|---|---|
| Method A | 62 600 |
| Method B | 42 569 |
| Method C | 47 503 |
Conclusion: FHC-heavy Method A now leads. Method C balances savings with solid gains.
| Method | Stat Gain |
|---|---|
| Method A | 6 900 803 |
| Method B | 2 847 102 |
| Method C | 5 236 622 |
Conclusion: FHC (Method A) dominates at high stats; Happy Jumps (Method B) are suboptimal, while Method C remains a cost-effective alternative.